Comparison between flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for the management of kidney stone: systematic review and meta-analysis
NefrologiaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Metanálise
- Nível de evidência
- 1 · Evidência consolidada
- Revista
- BMC urology
- Publicado em
- 7 mai 2025
- Citações
- 17
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Comparison between flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath and standard ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy for the management of kidney stone: systematic review and meta-analysis
Ibrahim Alnadhari, Osama Abdeljaleel, Omar Ali, Ahmad Shamsodini, Abdulla Al-Ansari, Morshed Salah
Descritores MeSH
- Kidney Calculi
- Ureteroscopy
- Ureteroscopes
- Equipment Design
- Humans
- Suction
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Flexible ureteroscopy with integrated suction, a useful innovation: a systematic review by the YAU and EAU endourology sections
- Efficacy and safety of flexible and navigable suction access sheaths versus traditional access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional ureteral access sheath for flexible ureteroscopy in renal and proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
- Flexible Ureteroscopy with a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of 2-3 cm Renal Stones: An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
- Sucção versus bainhas de acesso ureterais tradicionais em cirurgia intrarrenal retrógrada: revisão sistemática atualizada e meta-análise de taxas e complicações livres de pedras