The accuracy of conventional versus digital (intraoral scanner or photogrammetry) impression techniques in full-arch implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review
Medicina e TecnologiaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Revisão sistemática
- Nível de evidência
- 1 · Evidência consolidada
- Revista
- Evidence-based dentistry
- Publicado em
- 12 ago 2024
- Citações
- 47
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
The accuracy of conventional versus digital (intraoral scanner or photogrammetry) impression techniques in full-arch implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review
Nitchakul Joensahakij, Pravej Serichetaphongse, Wareeratn Chengprapakorn
Descritores MeSH
- Dental Impression Technique
- Photogrammetry
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
- Humans
- Computer-Aided Design
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Comparative analyses of accuracy between digital and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Photogrammetry Versus Intraoral Scanning in Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of complete arch implant scanning techniques performed extraorally: Reverse impression and extraoral photogrammetry methods. Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the American Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics
- Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions in partially dentate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis