Comparative analyses of accuracy between digital and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-A systematic review and meta-analysis
Medicina e TecnologiaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Metanálise
- Nível de evidência
- 1 · Evidência consolidada
- Revista
- Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
- Publicado em
- 14 jul 2025
- Citações
- 14
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Comparative analyses of accuracy between digital and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-A systematic review and meta-analysis
Amal Alfaraj, Fatema Alqudaihi, Zohaib Khurshid, Osama Qadiri, Wei-Shao Lin
Descritores MeSH
- Dental Impression Technique
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
- Humans
- Photogrammetry
- Computer-Aided Design
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Photogrammetry Versus Intraoral Scanning in Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- The accuracy of conventional versus digital (intraoral scanner or photogrammetry) impression techniques in full-arch implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review
- Does intra-oral scan improve the impression accuracy of full-arch implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Accuracy, scanning time, and patient satisfaction of stereophotogrammetry systems for acquiring 3D dental implant positions: A systematic review