Repairing Dehiscence Defects at Implant Sites Using β-Tricalcium Phosphate/Calcium Sulfate Versus Xenograft Combined With Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial
MedicinaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Ensaio clínico randomizado
- Nível de evidência
- 2 · Nova evidência
- Revista
- The Journal of oral implantology
- Publicado em
- 1 fev 2025
- Citações
- 1
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Repairing Dehiscence Defects at Implant Sites Using β-Tricalcium Phosphate/Calcium Sulfate Versus Xenograft Combined With Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Aksornsan Pongsettakul, Narit Leepong, Srisurang Suttapreyasri
Descritores MeSH
- Calcium Sulfate
- Surgical Wound Dehiscence
- Dental Implants
- Bone Transplantation
- Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
- Bone Substitutes
- Calcium Phosphates
- Humans
- Male
- Membranes, Artificial
Estudos relacionados
- Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six-month results of hard-tissue changes
- Comparative evidence of different surgical techniques for the management of vertical alveolar ridge defects in terms of complications and efficacy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration: Leukocyte and PRF Bone Block vs a Mixture of Autogenous Bone with DBBM: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial with up to 1 Year of Follow-up After Implant Loading
- Autogenous dentin-derived membrane as a biologic alternative to collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a randomized clinical trial