Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six-month results of hard-tissue changes
MedicinaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Ensaio clínico randomizado
- Nível de evidência
- 2 · Nova evidência
- Revista
- Journal of clinical periodontology
- Publicado em
- 8 mar 2022
- Citações
- 0
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six-month results of hard-tissue changes
G Benic, Stefan P Bienz, Young Woo Song, Jae-Kook Cha, Christoph H F Hämmerle, Ui-Won Jung, Ronald E. Jung
Descritores MeSH
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
- Dental Implants
- Bone Substitutes
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous
- Humans
- Membranes, Artificial
- Minerals
- Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
- Bone Regeneration
- Collagen
Estudos relacionados
- Repairing Dehiscence Defects at Implant Sites Using β-Tricalcium Phosphate/Calcium Sulfate Versus Xenograft Combined With Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Vertical ridge augmentation with Ti-reinforced dense polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes or Ti-meshes and collagen membranes: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial
- Soft-tissue dimensional change following guided bone regeneration on peri-implant defects using soft-type block or particulate bone substitutes: 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial
- Comparative evidence of different surgical techniques for the management of vertical alveolar ridge defects in terms of complications and efficacy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis