Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes and Outcome Measures Evaluating Timing of Implant Loading in the Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies
OrtopediaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
To identify patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-reported outcomes (ClinROs) and their outcome measures (PROMs and CROMs) used in prospective studies comparing immediate, early, and delayed implant loading protocols in edentulous maxilla patients receiving implant-supported prostheses.
Protocol-driven electronic searches were conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane databases-January 2014 to May 2024-to identify prospective interventional and observational studies comparing immediate, early, delayed implant loading in maxillary edentulous patients. Zygomatic implants were excluded. Risk of bias was performed using Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and results were reported descriptively.
O que encontraram
Five studies were included, of which four compared immediate versus delayed loading and one study compared immediate versus early loading. PROMs like visual analog scale (VAS) tool (reported in 80%) to evaluate 7 PROs: pain, overall satisfaction, comfort, speech, masticatory function, esthetics, and self-esteem. Three studies reported Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-19, OHIP-20), McGill Pain Questionnaire, and condition-specific instruments assessing two outcomes: chewing ability and muscular activity during oral functions. ClinROs varied considerably between studies, demonstrating significant methodological diversity. ClinROs included implant stability, accuracy, occlusal parameters, periodontal health metrics, surgical outcomes, and esthetic evaluation via VAS.
Por que isso importa
PROs were predominantly assessed using VAS to evaluate patient satisfaction, pain, function, and esthetics, followed by the OHIP Questionnaire for quality-of-life assessment in immediate versus early/delayed loading protocols. ClinROs showed no standardized approach, creating significant heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. Standardization of assessment methods and reporting of PROMs/CROMs is needed to optimize analyzing patient-centered outcomes.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes and Outcome Measures Evaluating Timing of Implant Loading in the Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies
Claudio Mendes Pannuti, Mohamed A Hassan, Isabella Neme Ribeiro Reis, Cristina Cunha Villar, Helena Francisco, Giuseppe Alexandre Romito
Descritores MeSH
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous
- Maxilla
- Dental Implants
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
- Immediate Dental Implant Loading
- Jaw, Edentulous
- Humans
- Time Factors
- Patient Satisfaction
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes and Outcome Measures Evaluating Maxillary Full Arch Fixed Prostheses Supported by Different Numbers of Implants: A Systematic Review
- Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes and the Outcome Measures in Studies Reporting on Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla With Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis Using Short, Standard-Length and/or Zygomatic Implants: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies Published in the Last 10 Years
- Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes and Outcome Measures Evaluating Timing of Implant Placement in the Edentulous Maxilla: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies
- Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes and Outcome Measures for Edentulous Maxilla Rehabilitated With Implant-Assisted Overdentures: A Systematic Review
- Efeito do número de implante nos desfechos relatados pelo paciente na maxila edêntula: revisão sistemática e metanálise