Long versus short peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: results of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
GastroenterologiaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Ensaio clínico randomizado
- Nível de evidência
- 2 · Nova evidência
- Revista
- Gut
- Publicado em
- 18 abr 2023
- Citações
- 49
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Long versus short peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: results of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
Pietro Familiari, Federica Borrelli de Andreis, Rosario Landi, Francesca Mangiola, Ivo Boskoski, Andrea Tringali, Vincenzo Perri, Guido Costamagna
Descritores MeSH
- Myotomy
- Esophageal Achalasia
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
- Humans
- Quality of Life
- Treatment Outcome
- Esophagoscopy
- Esophageal Sphincter, Lower
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Comparison of the safety, efficacy, and rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease between full-thickness versus modified peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Long-term Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy vs laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial
- Prevalence and clinical characteristics of blown-out myotomy after E-POEM for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis