Comparison of the safety, efficacy, and rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease between full-thickness versus modified peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
GastroenterologiaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Metanálise
- Nível de evidência
- 1 · Evidência consolidada
- Revista
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy
- Publicado em
- 21 jul 2025
- Citações
- 5
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Comparison of the safety, efficacy, and rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease between full-thickness versus modified peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar, Sahib Singh, Vishali Moond, Sai Sreeram Pannala, Khyati Bidani, Babu P Mohan, Hafiz Muzaffar Akbar Khan, Jean Chalhoub, Youssef El Douaihy, Sherif Andrawes et al.
Descritores MeSH
- Postoperative Complications
- Esophagoscopy
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
- Myotomy
- Esophageal Achalasia
- Operative Time
- Esophagitis, Peptic
- Humans
- Treatment Outcome