Comparing Small Buccal Dehiscence Defects Treated With or Without Guided Bone Regeneration: A Subanalysis of an RCT
MedicinaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Ensaio clínico randomizado
- Nível de evidência
- 2 · Nova evidência
- Revista
- The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry
- Publicado em
- 7 nov 2025
- Citações
- 1
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Comparing Small Buccal Dehiscence Defects Treated With or Without Guided Bone Regeneration: A Subanalysis of an RCT
Anina N Zuercher, Sven Mühlemann, Edwin Ruales-Carrera, Jenni Hjerppe, Ronald E Jung, Daniel S Thoma
Descritores MeSH
- Surgical Wound Dehiscence
- Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
- Bone Regeneration
- Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous
- Treatment Outcome
- Adult
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
- Female
- Humans
Estudos relacionados
- Block Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral for Guided Bone Regeneration of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects: A 5-Year Randomized Controlled Trial
- Hard and soft tissue contour changes following simultaneous guided bone regeneration at single peri-implant dehiscence defects using either resorbable or non-resorbable membranes: a 6-month secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
- Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration: Leukocyte and PRF Bone Block vs a Mixture of Autogenous Bone with DBBM: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial with up to 1 Year of Follow-up After Implant Loading
- Buccal Bone Dimensional Changes Following Implant Placement and Guided Bone Regeneration With Submerged or Transmucosal Approach: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study
- Ensaio Clínico Controlado Randomizado Comparando o Parafuso Retido Monolítico Zirconia Implante Coroas em Base de Titânio Padronizado Versus Personalizado Titanium Abutments - Dados de 3 anos