
Ensaio Clínico Controlado Randomizado Comparando o Parafuso Retido Monolítico Zirconia Implante Coroas em Base de Titânio Padronizado Versus Personalizado Titanium Abutments - Dados de 3 anos
MedicinaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
To assess 3-year interim results of implant-supported monolithic zirconia single crowns on standardized titanium base vs. customized titanium abutments.
Patients in need of posterior implant were recruited. After implant healing time, patients were randomly allocated to: Ti-Base (n = 30) with a monolithic zirconia crown on a standardized Ti-Base abutment or Custom (n = 30) with a monolithic zirconia crown on a customized titanium abutment. Implant crowns were evaluated at Baseline (BL), 1-year (1Y-FU), and 3 years (3Y-FU) follow-ups for marginal bone level changes (MBL), survival, biological and technical outcomes, and PROMs. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact test were used to assess association between categorical variables, Mann-Whitney's test to compare the distribution of parameters between groups, with a significance level of 5% (α = 0.05).
https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00012733.
O que encontraram
Fifty-one patients (23 Custom, 28 Ti-Base) attended 3Y-FU visit. No implant crowns were lost. Similar median MBL changes from BL to 3Y-FU and comparable biological outcomes were observed in both groups (p > 0.05). No major technical complications were observed, but one minor chipping of Ti-Base zirconia crown was recorded at 3Y-FU, resulting in a technical complication rate of 3.6% for this group. At the 3Y-FU, all patients in the Custom group and 26 patients (92.9%) in the Ti-Base group were very satisfied with the treatment (p > 0.05).
Por que isso importa
Within the limitations of this interim analysis, monolithic zirconia single crowns on either standardized titanium base or customized titanium abutments demonstrated stable marginal bone levels, high survival rates, high patient satisfaction, and no major technical complications during the 3Y follow-up period.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Screw-Retained Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns on Standardized Titanium Base Versus Customized Titanium Abutments- 3-Years Data
Jenni Hjerppe, Stephanie A Wenk, Shunsuke Fukuba, Sven Mühlemann, Ronald E. Jung, Daniel Stefan Thoma
Descritores MeSH
- Dental Abutments
- Crowns
- Titanium
- Zirconium
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Dental Implant-Abutment Design
- Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
- Treatment Outcome
Estudos relacionados
- A Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating 3-Year Survival Rates and Technical Complications of Screw-Retained Hybrid Abutment Crowns on Two-Piece Zirconia and Titanium Implants
- Angulated titanium bases screw channel abutments for single implant restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Peri-implant and esthetic outcomes of cemented and screw-retained crowns using zirconia abutments in single implant-supported restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis
- A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial Comparing Cement-Retained Monolithic CAD-CAM Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns for Single Posterior Implant Restorations
- Clinical performance of single implant prostheses restored using titanium base abutments: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Clinical performance of implant-supported single hybrid abutment crown restoration: A systematic review and meta-analysis