ScienceMed®

Clinical simulation and deliberate practice in rapid-cycle deliberate practice: a randomized clinical trial

Medicina

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaRevista brasileira de enfermagem12 dez 20250 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

to compare clinical simulation with a standardized patient with rapid-cycle deliberate practice in knowledge acquisition, perception of experience and scenario design in the care of patients with suspected stroke.

a randomized clinical trial conducted between 2022 and 2023 involving 134 undergraduate nursing students. After a theoretical class, participants were randomly assigned to one group. A questionnaire was administered before and after the practical sessions to assess knowledge, in addition to the Educational Practices Questionnaire and the Simulation Design Scale.

O que encontraram

the groups showed significant improvement in knowledge (p<0.001), with no difference between them (p=1.0). Rapid-cycle deliberate practice obtained a better assessment regarding design (p=0.03).

Por que isso importa

the strategies are effective and recommended in nursing education, although rapid-cycle deliberate practice showed advantages in student engagement. Universal Trial Number: U1111-1295-1246.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Clinical simulation and deliberate practice in rapid-cycle deliberate practice: a randomized clinical trial

Gisele Cabral da Silva, Cássia Regina Vancini Campanharo, Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira Lopes, Meiry Fernanda Pinto Okuno, Carla Roberta Monteiro Miura, Ruth Ester Assayag Batista

Descritores MeSH

  • Simulation Training
  • Adult
  • Clinical Competence
  • Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate
  • Educational Measurement
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Students, Nursing

Estudos relacionados