ScienceMed®

Artificial Intelligence in Dental Treatment Planning and Diagnostic Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Medicina e Tecnologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Lâmina de silício com circuitos integrados. Inductiveload · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

MetanáliseNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaClinical and experimental dental research1 abr 20263 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the use of AI in dental diagnostic decision-making and treatment planning, evaluating both diagnostic accuracy and its influence on clinical decision-making across different dental specialties and imaging modalities.

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted from database inception to December 2025. Eligible studies evaluated AI algorithms used for dental diagnostic tasks or treatment planning and reported quantitative performance metrics or measurable decision-making outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool diagnostic performance measures.

O que encontraram

Twenty-seven studies involving 60,857 radiographic images were included. AI systems demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76-0.91) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97). The pooled F1-score was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96), and pooled precision was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-0.96). For segmentation tasks, the pooled Dice Similarity Coefficient was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.13-1.00). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I² > 95%). YOLO-based architectures achieved the highest performance for tooth detection and segmentation, with sensitivities approaching 99% and mean average precision exceeding 0.96. AI assistance also improved diagnostic efficiency and interobserver agreement while reducing diagnostic interpretation time.

Por que isso importa

AI systems demonstrate strong diagnostic performance in dental imaging and decision support, particularly for tooth detection, segmentation, and pathology identification. However, substantial heterogeneity, retrospective study designs, and limited external validation highlight the need for rigorous prospective evaluation before widespread clinical implementation.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Artificial Intelligence in Dental Treatment Planning and Diagnostic Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mohammad Alabdulkareem, Momen A Atieh, Ammar AbuMostafa, Khaled Aldalaan, Nada Alturki

Descritores MeSH

  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Patient Care Planning
  • Algorithms
  • Humans
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Veja também

Estudos relacionados