
Analysis of bone dimensional stability after two-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone versus bovine bone mineral combined with autogenous bone chips: results from a 1-year multicenter split-mouth randomized controlled trial
MedicinaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
To compare the dimensional stability of augmented bone following maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) using autogenous bone (AB) alone or bovine bone mineral combined with locally harvested AB chips (BBM), one year after implant loading.
A secondary analysis of a split-mouth, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted among 20 patients (40 implants). CBCT/CTs were used to measure bone height (buccal and palatal aspects) and bone area at the implant center at two time points: before implant placement (4-6 months post-MSFA, T1) and 12 months post-implant loading (T2). Residual bone height and sinus width at 1, 5, and 10 mm from the crest were also recorded. Linear regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the influence of graft material (AB and BBM), initial graft dimensions and sinus width on dimensional changes.
O que encontraram
Adjusted regression models showed that AB-treated sites experienced significantly greater reductions in graft height (mean difference at buccal sites: -1.76 mm [95 % CI, -0.86 to -2.65]; p-value = <0.001); mean difference at palatal sites: -1.82 mm [95 % CI -0.75 to -2.88]; p = 0.001; and bone area (mean difference -17.80 mm² [95 % CI -6.61 to -28.99]; p = 0.002) compared to BBM. Greater initial graft height and area were associated with reduced dimensional changes (p < 0.001) especially when using BBM. Sinus width, measured 10 mm from the crest, was modestly but significantly associated with changes in bone height (p = 0.020), but not with changes in bone area (p = 0.147).
Por que isso importa
MSFA using BBM combined with autogenous bone chips resulted in greater dimensional stability compared to AB alone.
BBM combined with autogenous bone chips better preserved graft dimensions than AB alone.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Analysis of bone dimensional stability after two-stage maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone versus bovine bone mineral combined with autogenous bone chips: results from a 1-year multicenter split-mouth randomized controlled trial
Isabella Neme Ribeiro Dos Reis, Anouck Jue, Eppo Wolvius, Justin Pijpe, Rubens Spin-Neto, Ronald Ernest Jung, Nadja Naenni, Franz J Strauss, Brend Jonker
Descritores MeSH
- Bone Substitutes
- Bone Transplantation
- Sinus Floor Augmentation
- Minerals
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Maxilla
- Maxillary Sinus
Estudos relacionados
- A enxertia óssea autógena não aumenta a reparação óssea em seios maxilares enxertados com fosfato β-tricálcico: um ensaio controlado randomizado de boca dividida
- Endo-sinus bone gain following sinus membrane elevation without graft compared with sinus floor augmentation and a composite graft: a one-year single-blind randomized controlled trial
- Clinical, radiographic, and histological/histomorphometric analysis of maxillary sinus grafting with deproteinized porcine or bovine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial
- Assessment of absorbable gelatin sponge for maxillary sinus floor elevation versus anorganic bovine bone minerals: a randomized clinical trial