ScienceMed®

Accuracy of Static, Dynamic, and Robotic Guided Surgery in Immediate Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Medicina
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Lâmina de silício com circuitos integrados. Inductiveload · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaClinical oral implants research19 fev 20268 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

To evaluate the accuracy of static, dynamic, and robotic computer-assisted protocols in immediate implant placement (IIP), compared to freehand (FH) techniques.

A systematic search was conducted for studies published through March 2025. Clinical studies on Computer-Aided Implant Surgery (CAIS), reporting angular and/or linear deviations between the planned and actual implant position after IIP were included. Eligible designs comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs), prospective/retrospective cohort studies (Retro), and prospective/retrospective case series (PCS/RCS). A network meta-analysis was performed to assess deviations in implant angulation, platform, and apex positions among FH, half-guided static (HG-sCAIS), fully-guided static (FG-sCAIS), dynamic (dCAIS), and robotic (rCAIS) protocols. Covariates such as jaw, site position, study design, and risk of bias were included. Two post hoc sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

O que encontraram

Eighteen studies encompassing 780 immediately placed implants were analyzed (6 RCTs; 2 PCS; 7 RCS; 3 Retro). Compared with FH, every guided protocol significantly enhanced accuracy. Mean angular deviation decreased by 3.36° with rCAIS, 2.66° with dCAIS, 1.73° with HG-sCAIS, and 1.85° with FG-sCAIS (p < 0.05). Corresponding reductions in platform deviation were 0.68, 0.71, 0.27, and 0.54 mm, while apex deviation decreased by 1.43, 1.32, 1.23, and 0.81 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). rCAIS and dCAIS ranked highest across all metrics.

Por que isso importa

Within the limitations of this study, guided surgery significantly improves the accuracy of immediate implant placement. rCAIS and dCAIS demonstrated the most favorable accuracy profiles, although sensitivity analyses restricted to higher-quality evidence suggest that differences among guided protocols may be less pronounced.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Accuracy of Static, Dynamic, and Robotic Guided Surgery in Immediate Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Paolo Nava, Hamoun Sabri, Parham Hazrati, Carlo Nava, Muhammad H A Saleh, Hom-Lay Wang

Descritores MeSH

  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted
  • Immediate Dental Implant Loading
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures
  • Humans
  • Dental Implants

Veja também

Estudos relacionados