
Accuracy of Static, Dynamic, and Robotic Guided Surgery in Immediate Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
MedicinaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
To evaluate the accuracy of static, dynamic, and robotic computer-assisted protocols in immediate implant placement (IIP), compared to freehand (FH) techniques.
A systematic search was conducted for studies published through March 2025. Clinical studies on Computer-Aided Implant Surgery (CAIS), reporting angular and/or linear deviations between the planned and actual implant position after IIP were included. Eligible designs comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs), prospective/retrospective cohort studies (Retro), and prospective/retrospective case series (PCS/RCS). A network meta-analysis was performed to assess deviations in implant angulation, platform, and apex positions among FH, half-guided static (HG-sCAIS), fully-guided static (FG-sCAIS), dynamic (dCAIS), and robotic (rCAIS) protocols. Covariates such as jaw, site position, study design, and risk of bias were included. Two post hoc sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
O que encontraram
Eighteen studies encompassing 780 immediately placed implants were analyzed (6 RCTs; 2 PCS; 7 RCS; 3 Retro). Compared with FH, every guided protocol significantly enhanced accuracy. Mean angular deviation decreased by 3.36° with rCAIS, 2.66° with dCAIS, 1.73° with HG-sCAIS, and 1.85° with FG-sCAIS (p < 0.05). Corresponding reductions in platform deviation were 0.68, 0.71, 0.27, and 0.54 mm, while apex deviation decreased by 1.43, 1.32, 1.23, and 0.81 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). rCAIS and dCAIS ranked highest across all metrics.
Por que isso importa
Within the limitations of this study, guided surgery significantly improves the accuracy of immediate implant placement. rCAIS and dCAIS demonstrated the most favorable accuracy profiles, although sensitivity analyses restricted to higher-quality evidence suggest that differences among guided protocols may be less pronounced.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Accuracy of Static, Dynamic, and Robotic Guided Surgery in Immediate Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Paolo Nava, Hamoun Sabri, Parham Hazrati, Carlo Nava, Muhammad H A Saleh, Hom-Lay Wang
Descritores MeSH
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
- Immediate Dental Implant Loading
- Robotic Surgical Procedures
- Humans
- Dental Implants
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Precisão de implantação com cirurgia robótica, navegação dinâmica, guia totalmente estático e cirurgia de mão livre: revisão sistemática e meta-análise de rede
- Cirurgia Robótica de Implante Dental Assistida por Computador Versus Livre-Mão e Técnicas Guiadas: Revisão Sistemática e Meta-Análise de Ensaios Controlados Randomizados
- Robot-assisted dental implant surgery: A systematic review of available clinical evidence
- Trueness of Dental Implant Placement With Robotic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies