
Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Flexible Ureterorenoscopy, and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower Pole Renal Stones
NefrologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
Lower pole stones (LPSs) frequently cause significant morbidity, necessitating effective intervention strategies. We systematically reviewed the evidence for treatment of LPSs with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) previously in 2015. In this update, we have included 16 new randomised controlled trials plus eight from our original review (24 in total). Despite the increase in available trials, the certainty of evidence remains moderate for stone-free rates (SFRs), underscoring the on-going need for more robust trials in this domain. FURS demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving SFRs to ESWL (risk ratio [RR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05, 1.35), although the absolute difference remains modest. ESWL may lead to fewer complications, and FURS could result in more unplanned procedures and retreatments. It remains unclear whether there are differences in quality of life and cost estimates vary depending on the country. PCNL offers a marginal yet statistically significant advantage over FURS in terms of SFRs (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01, 1.12), but it is unclear whether there are differences in unplanned procedures, retreatments, or complications, and there was conflicting evidence about health status and return to normal activities. SFRs were superior with PCNL to those with ESWL (RR 1.42 95% CI 1.28, 1.58). Unplanned procedures and retreatments were generally fewer for PCNL, and complications were fewer for ESWL. The cost effectiveness of each modality is highly dependent on the health care system and country-specific economic factors. The overall certainty of the evidence remains unchanged, with only moderate improvements in certain domains.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Flexible Ureterorenoscopy, and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Lower Pole Renal Stones
Steven MacLennan, Oliver Wiseman, Daron Smith, Kathryn Starr, Lorna Aucott, Rodolfo Hernández, Paul Manson, Ruth Thomas, Charles Terry Clark, Graeme MacLennan et al.
Descritores MeSH
- Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
- Kidney Calculi
- Lithotripsy
- Ureteroscopy
- Humans
- Treatment Outcome
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Evaluation of outcomes in kidney stone management: stone-free rate vs. cost vs. quality of life: a systematic review from EAU endourology
- Antibiotic prophylaxis in stone surgery: a systematic review of the literature
- Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy: a case-control study and meta-analysis
- Cost-effectiveness and health economics for ureteral and kidney stone disease: a systematic review of literature
- Cirurgia intrarrenal retrógrada com bainhas de acesso de sucção flexível e navegável vs nefrolitotomia mini-percutânea para grandes cálculos do trato urinário superior: revisão sistemática e metanálise