ScienceMed®

Treatment Effects and Treatment Time in Adolescents With Crowded and Displaced Teeth Treated With Fixed Appliance Systems Without Extractions: A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial

Medicina
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Radiografia da mão de uma criança de 4 anos (Viena, 1896). Josef Maria Eder e Eduard Valenta · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaOrthodontics & craniofacial research23 jul 20252 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

To assess and compare treatment effects and treatment time in adolescents with crowded and displaced teeth during and after non-extraction treatments using a passive self-ligating bracket system (PSLB) and a conventional bracket system (CB).

Consecutive adolescents (12-17 years old) with crowded and displaced teeth were randomised through computer generated block randomisation in a two-arm parallel-group design, to non-extraction fixed appliance treatment with either PSLB (Damon Q, n = 62) or CB (Victory, n = 70) at four orthodontic clinics. Study models and cephalograms were collected at baseline, post-alignment and post-treatment. Primary outcome was assessed with weighted Peer Assessment Rating index (wPAR) and secondary outcomes with Little's Irregularity Index (LII), and as transversal width (mm), incisor inclination (°), position (mm) and treatment time (months).

The protocol is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05664282).

O que encontraram

Intergroup differences in wPAR with mean score reductions of -24.07 (CB) and -22.11 (PSLB), LII upper/lower arch reductions of -9.02/-5.96 (CB) and -8.44/-5.29 (PSLB), and mean treatment times of 21.74 (CB) and 24.35 (PSLB) months were non-significant (NS). Lateral expansion was greater in the PSLB group during alignment; mean intergroup maxillary differences (MD) were 1.35 at inter-canines, 1.21 mm at first inter-premolars, and mandibular MD were 0.75 at first, 0.76 mm at second inter-premolars (p ≤ 0.019). Greater incisor proclination was observed in the CB group (L1NB, MD = 2.28°; ILiML, MD = 2.23°) (p ≤ 0.016). Intergroup differences post-treatment were NS.

Por que isso importa

Great occlusal treatment outcomes were observed in both groups with no significant difference in treatment time. Although the expansion patterns differed during alignment, no significant intergroup difference remained after treatment.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Treatment Effects and Treatment Time in Adolescents With Crowded and Displaced Teeth Treated With Fixed Appliance Systems Without Extractions: A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial

Linda Bokander Matilainen, Kristina Johansson, Michal Wiaderny, Anna Brechter, Sofia Petrén, Vincenzo D'Antò, Liselotte Paulsson

Descritores MeSH

  • Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed
  • Malocclusion
  • Tooth Avulsion
  • Orthodontic Brackets
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incisor
  • Male
  • Orthodontic Appliance Design
  • Time Factors