ScienceMed®

The Cost-Effectiveness of Conservatively Managed Acute Appendicitis Versus Appendicectomy: A Systematic Review

Gastroenterologia

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaSurgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques1 jun 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Appendicectomy remains the gold standard treatment for acute appendicitis. While there is continued debate as to the clinical benefit of conservative treatment in acute appendicitis, the cost-effectiveness of each treatment is a critical consideration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the current health economic evidence for surgery versus conservative management in acute appendicitis.

A systematic literature search of 3 online databases for evidence pertaining to the economics of appendectomy compared with conservative management was performed according to PRISMA standards. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (study ID: CRD42023412691).

Analysis indicates conservative management as the economically preferable option for acute appendicitis over surgery. This finding underscores its potential significance for resource-constrained health care systems. However, standardized studies with extended follow-up in different global health care settings are required to evaluate the economic and clinical merits of both treatment strategies.

O que encontraram

A total of 1219 patients were included (639 operative treatment vs. 580 conservative management). A total of 5 studies were included. Surgery was significantly more expensive when compared with conservative treatment (16.5% to 83.0%) percentage cost difference. The average length of hospitalisation was similar between the groups. The majority of studies reported a 12-month follow-up. The CHEERS assessment revealed a considerable risk of bias.

Por que isso importa

Conservative management of appendicitis is the more economically effective treatment of the 2 modalities. This is an important consideration for resource-limited health care systems. However, further research with standardized methodologies and longer-term follow-up is warranted to fully assess the economic implications and clinical effectiveness of both treatment approaches.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

The Cost-Effectiveness of Conservatively Managed Acute Appendicitis Versus Appendicectomy: A Systematic Review

Imran Farhad, Muhammad A Khan, Aaron Kler, Mihir Trivedy, Dale Vimalachandran, Matthew Fok

Descritores MeSH

  • Conservative Treatment
  • Appendectomy
  • Appendicitis
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • Acute Disease

Veja também