ScienceMed®

Resultados Longitudinais da Radiofrequência Pulsada do Nervo Occipital Maior Bilateral e Unilateral em Enxaqueca: Um Ensaio Aleatório Prospectivo Controlado

Neurologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Nervo em corte transversal ao microscópio óptico. Berkshire Community College Bioscience Image Library · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)13 ago 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Greater occipital nerve pulsed radiofrequency (GON-PRF) is an effective neuromodulatory treatment for migraine; however, evidence directly comparing unilateral and bilateral approaches remains limited. This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided proximal GON-PRF performed unilaterally versus bilaterally at the C2 level in patients with migraine.

A total of 187 patients were randomized to receive unilateral (n = 91) or bilateral (n = 96) ultrasound-guided proximal GON-PRF without concomitant local anesthetic or corticosteroids. Per-protocol analyses included 78 and 88 participants in the unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the change in monthly headache days (MHD) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, acute medication days (AMD), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) grades, and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scores. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed using multivariable Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).

O que encontraram

Of the 187 randomized participants, 166 completed the 6-month follow-up and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all outcomes throughout follow-up (all p < 0.001). At month 6, the Bilateral Group showed lower MHD values (median [IQR]: 7.0 [6.0] vs. 10.0 [6.0], p = 0.030), a higher ≥50% MHD responder rate (77.3% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.003), and lower AMD values (p = 0.024). Adjusted GEE analyses demonstrated significant treatment effects favoring the Bilateral Group for average VAS (p = 0.047) and HIT-6 (p = 0.004). GPE scores also favored the Bilateral Group at month 6 (p = 0.044). No procedure-related complications occurred.

Por que isso importa

Both unilateral and bilateral ultrasound-guided proximal GON-PRF provided significant clinical improvement in patients with migraine. However, bilateral treatment demonstrated superior longitudinal outcomes, including lower headache frequency, reduced acute medication use, higher ≥50% MHD responder rates, and greater patient-reported improvement. These findings remained consistent after adjustment for baseline covariates.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Longitudinal Outcomes of Bilateral and Unilateral Proximal Greater Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in Migraine: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Şükriye Dadali, Nevcihan Sahutoglu Bal, Ülkü Sabuncu, Gülçin Babaoğlu, Ali Costu, Hatice Babaoglan, Mustafa Cem Yilmaz, Şeref Celik, Şaziye Şahin, Erkan Yavuz Akcaboy

Descritores MeSH

  • Migraine Disorders
  • Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Adult
  • Pain Measurement
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Middle Aged

Veja também