
Ressecção precisa guiada por neuronavegação versus cirurgia convencional de glioma: uma meta-análise de desfechos clínicos
OncologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
Neuronavigational surgery has become a cutting-edge technique that improves surgical accuracy, increases tumor excision rates, and preserves neurological function in glioma patients
This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of neuronavigational and advanced imaging-assisted surgery compared to traditional glioma surgery
In total, 30 articles published between 2006 and 2026, including randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, and case series, were evaluated. The intervention involved intraoperative MRI (iMRI), ultrasound-guided navigation, functional neuronavigation, and other advanced navigational technologies. Meta-analysis was carried out using random effects models with inverse variance to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), I 2 and τ 2 measures of heterogeneity, and publication bias using funnel plots and Egger’s regression test. The risk of bias was assessed through the Cochrane RoB 2 for 7 randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-I for 23 observational studies
O que encontraram
Overall analysis demonstrated significant improvement with neuronavigation-guided surgery (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 2.05–2.74, p < 0.05; I 2 = 22.8%). Subgroup analyses showed significant benefits for iMRI-guided surgery (OR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.92–3.23, z = 6.88, I 2 = 22.6%, τ 2 = 0.0428, p = 0.2286), ultrasound-based navigation (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.47–2.66, z = 4.50, I 2 = 4.9%, τ 2 = 0.0084, p = 0.3685), functional neuronavigation (OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.59–2.80, z = 5.17, I 2 = 0%), advanced navigation technologies (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.67–3.25, z = 4.99, I 2 = 16.4%), and other specialized techniques (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.63–2.86, z = 5.34, I 2 = 8.3%). Leave-one-out analysis confirmed the stability of the pooled effect, with minimal changes after exclusion of individual studies
Por que isso importa
Neuronavigation-based and image-enhanced surgical procedures can significantly improve glioma surgery outcomes, with low heterogeneity and strong pooled effects. Large-scale multicenter studies are needed in order to prove their efficacy in the long term
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Neuronavigation-guided precise resection versus conventional glioma surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
Shuanglei Guo, Kang He, Bingjian Yuan, Xiaobing Chen, Honglin Liu, Zhenjiang Li
Descritores MeSH
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
- Neuronavigation
- Glioma
- Brain Neoplasms
- Neurosurgical Procedures
- Treatment Outcome
- Humans
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Intraoperative technologies in high grade glioma surgery: strategic implementation for Asia-Pacific centers
- Fluorescence-guided glioma surgery improves intraoperative visualization and resection without increasing neurological morbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Fluorescence-guided versus non-fluorescence-guided resection in high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival outcomes
- Connectome-guided glioma resection: a systematic review of white matter tract preservation and postoperative neurocognition
- Comparative Efficacy of Various of Virtual Reality Technologies on Cognitive Function in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
- The use of intraoperative tractography in brain tumor and epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis