Resin-based sealing vs resin-modified glass-ionomer filling for treatment of occlusal cavitated dentine caries lesions in primary molars - a multi-center randomized controlled split-mouth 3-year follow-up clinical trial
MedicinaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
To evaluate if covering occlusal cavitated dentine caries lesions with limited extension (no more than one third of the bucco-lingual or disto-mesial width of the occlusal surface) in primary molars with resin-based sealing (RBS)-without previous removal of caries-would result in a lower 3-year rate of success than if all caries was removed and the cavity was filled with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), and to assess if the experience of the two treatments differed according to evaluation performed by the children and the dentists.
RBS and RMGIC treatments of occlusal cavitated dentine caries lesions with limited extension in primary molars were evaluated as "defective" or "defect-free" after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months in a split-mouth-study of 66 children (30girls, 36 boys) aged 4.77 ± 1.27 years. The children ranked their own experience (C-Face) for each treatment on a 7-grade face-scale, and the dentists evaluated the child's experience (D-C-exp), cooperation (D-coop) on a four-grade scale as either 'very bad', 'quite bad', 'quite good', or 'very good'.
gov Identifier: NCT05475145.
O que encontraram
After three years 71.2% of RBS and 84.8% of RMGIC were defect-free (p = 0.093). D-C-exp was better for RBS (1.27 ± 0.51) than for RMGIC (1.53 ± 0.81) (p = 0.005), while no significant difference regarding C-Face or D-Coop was found between the two methods.
Por que isso importa
RBS method for treatment of occlusal cavitated dentine caries lesions with limited extension (no more than one third of the bucco-lingual or disto-mesial width of the occlusal surface) in primary molars did not have a significantly lower rate of success, and was preferred by the patients, as compared to the conventional RMGIC method, according to the dentists' evaluation of patient experience.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Resin-based sealing vs resin-modified glass-ionomer filling for treatment of occlusal cavitated dentine caries lesions in primary molars - a multi-center randomized controlled split-mouth 3-year follow-up clinical trial
Mats Bågesund, Ann-Christine Olson, Sharre Chizarie, Maja Omanovic, Anna Zuber, Ann Ingemansson Hultquist
Descritores MeSH
- Resin Cements
- Composite Resins
- Dental Caries
- Dental Restoration, Permanent
- Glass Ionomer Cements
- Molar
- Pit and Fissure Sealants
- Tooth, Deciduous
- Treatment Outcome
- Child, Preschool
Estudos relacionados
- A randomized controlled clinical trial of the performance of three bioactive endodontic cements in primary molar teeth diagnosed with reversible pulpitis: 1-year follow-up study
- Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial
- Restorative Techniques for Permanent First Molars Affected by Hypomineralization: A Systematic Review
- Effect of silver diamine fluoride with or without potassium iodide treatment on retention of composite resin restorations in carious primary molars- a randomized clinical trial