ScienceMed®

Recuperação aprimorada após cirurgia para parto cesáreo: revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios randomizados com análise sequencial de ensaios

Cirurgia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Vilosidades coriônicas da placenta ao microscópio óptico. Mikael Häggström · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

MetanáliseNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)14 ago 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have improved perioperative care across multiple surgical specialties. In obstetrics, ERAS pathways for cesarean delivery have been increasingly adopted; however, their comparative effectiveness versus standard care remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis to compare ERAS protocols with standard perioperative care in cesarean delivery.

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) comparing ERAS and standard care in parturient undergoing cesarean delivery. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.2). We conducted subgroup analyses based on cesarean category (elective vs. emergency) and national income level. A Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was also performed.

O que encontraram

We included 13 RCTs comprising 1,809 parturient. ERAS was associated with a significant reduction in hospital Length of Stay (LOS) compared with standard care (MD = -17.05 hours, 95% CI -25.08 to -9.02 hours, I2 = 98.2%, n = 1,128, p < 0.01), with similar effects across elective and emergency cesarean deliveries. Greater reductions were observed in low- and middle-income countries, whereas no significant difference was identified in upper-middle-income settings, albeit formal subgroup test was not significant. ERAS was associated with lower postoperative pain at 24 and 48 hours, reduced wound infection, and higher maternal satisfaction, with no differences in readmission and postoperative nausea and vomiting. TSA suggested that the accrued sample size was adequate for hospital LOS; however, this should be interpreted cautiously given the substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity.

Por que isso importa

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that ERAS protocols may be associated with reduced hospital stay and improved maternal recovery after cesarean delivery.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Enhanced recovery after surgery for cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis

Tauãna Terra Cordeiro de Oliveira, Vanessa Tapioca, Eduardo Pereira, Bruna Ferreira, Tamiris Soares, Sara Amaral, Maria Luisa Assis, Gabriel Carvalho, Julio S Curi, Kamal Kumar

Descritores MeSH

  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Cesarean Section
  • Perioperative Care
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Pregnancy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Female

Veja também