Profilaxia Antimicrobiana de 3 dias em Ressecção Transuretral ou Vaporização Fotoeletiva da Próstata: Um Ensaio Multicêntrico, Randomizado, Controlado com Placebo (CITrUS Trial)

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Guidelines recommend single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for transurethral resection (TURP) and photoselective vaporization (PVP) of the prostate. As guideline adherence is low and 3-d AMP is given frequently, we aimed to assess the noninferiority of a single dose compared with 3-d AMP by comparing the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) within 30 d.

O que encontraram

A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial was conducted comparing single-dose with 3-d AMP in patients assigned to TURP and PVP, assuming a 9% event rate for a clinical diagnosis of a UTI with a 4.4% noninferiority margin.

Por que isso importa

In this randomized trial of transurethral prostate surgery patients, 11.0% of those on single-dose AMP and 8.5% on 3-d AMP were diagnosed with UTIs. The smaller than planned sample size precludes a definite interpretation favoring either group. Diagnoses of UTIs based on symptoms and bacteriuria reduced the overall rates and group differences.

O que ainda não sabemos

From anticipated 1574 patients, 728 were recruited and 621 randomized patients were analyzed fully. The study was preliminary stopped due to delayed recruitment and was analyzed exploratively. Following single-dose AMP, 11.0% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9%, 15.0%; 33/300) had a clinical diagnosis of UTIs, compared with 8.5% (95% CI 5.8%, 12.1%; 26/307) receiving 3-d AMP (between-group difference 2.5% [95% CI -2.2%, 7.5%]). The rates of UTIs supported by bacteriuria were lower without any difference between groups (single-dose AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 6.0%]; 3-d AMP: 3.3% [95% CI 1.8%, 5.9%]; between-group difference 0.08% [95% CI -2.97%, 3.16%]). Adverse events were rare.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.