ScienceMed®

Precisão diagnóstica dos testes de vigilância para carcinoma hepatocelular na cirrose: revisão sistemática e metanálise em rede

Gastroenterologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Tecido hepático humano ao microscópio óptico, coloração HE. Mikael Häggström · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaBMJ open gastroenterology17 jul 20261 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

For surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to be effective, tests-including imaging, serological biomarkers (conventional and genomic) and algorithms combining multiple tests-must identify early-stage tumours. We aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise studies reporting the accuracy of all such tests in people with cirrhosis.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (NMA-DTA) data.

MEDLINE and Embase (2005 to September 2025) and a published Cochrane review.

English-language, post-2005, one-gate or two-gate studies quantifying diagnostic accuracy of tests to detect HCC in populations wholly comprising people with cirrhosis, excluding those with pre-existing signs and symptoms of HCC.

Data extracted by one reviewer, checked by a second and made available in an open-access database. We assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2. We synthesised data using Bayesian NMA-DTA, accounting for tumour stage and incorporating continuous tests across all possible thresholds.

CRD42022357163.

O que encontraram

We included 170 studies (62 643 participants). Of 115 index tests, 97 were amenable to NMA-DTA. Ultrasound appears no better than alpha-fetoprotein at detecting very-early-stage HCC (sensitivity 0.34 (95% CrI 0.21 to 0.55) vs 0.39 (95% CrI 0.28 to 0.47)), only becoming superior as stage advances. Least affected by stage are contrast-enhanced MRI (sensitivity 0.70 (95% CrI 0.50 to 0.84) very-early; 0.86 (95% CrI 0.73 to 0.94) early; 0.90 (95% CrI 0.67 to 0.98) advanced) and CT (0.68 (95% CrI 0.26 to 0.93) very-early; 0.77 (95% CrI 0.29 to 0.95) early; 0.92 (95% CrI 0.49 to 0.99) advanced). No genomic biomarkers show convincing improvements over combinations of conventional blood-markers. Most studies are at high risk of bias, but conclusions are robust when restricting to studies with favourable methodological characteristics.

Por que isso importa

Using advanced synthesis methods, we found that tests have low sensitivity for detecting early-stage HCC. Given rising prevalence of cirrhosis and HCC, we need better tests and a stronger evidence-base to inform optimal surveillance strategies.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Diagnostic accuracy of surveillance tests for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Gabriel Rogers, Efthymia Derezea, Libby Sadler, Hanyu Wang, Matthew E Cramp, Stephen D Ryder, Kelsey Watt, Penny Whiting, Morwenna Rogers, John Bell et al.

Descritores MeSH

  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
  • Liver Cirrhosis
  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Ultrasonography
  • Algorithms
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • alpha-Fetoproteins

Veja também