ScienceMed®

Inteligência Artificial para Prever Resultados Perioperatórios em Cirurgia Cardíaca: Revisão Sistemática

Medicina e Tecnologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Pastilha de um conversor digital-analógico Ferranti ZN425 ao microscópio. Revaldinho · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaInnovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)13 jul 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Cardiac surgery carries a significant risk of complications and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML), is increasingly being explored to enhance perioperative risk prediction and support clinical decision-making. This systematic review evaluates the clinical applications, predictive performance, and limitations of AI models in cardiac surgery.

PubMed and Embase were searched for studies published between January 2020 and July 2025. Of 939 records identified, 178 studies met the inclusion criteria following screening and full-text review. Included studies applied AI to predict clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Key outcomes assessed were model performance metrics and their clinical utility.

O que encontraram

Among the 178 included studies, 114 (64%) were conducted in the United States or China. Most studies (n = 168, 94%) used retrospective designs and focused on adult populations. Random forest (n = 82, 46%), logistic regression (n = 82, 46%), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (n = 70, 39%) were the most frequently used algorithms. AI applications primarily targeted the prediction of postoperative complications (n = 102, 57%) and mortality (n = 70, 39%), with common outcomes including acute kidney injury and stroke. ML models consistently outperformed traditional clinical risk scores (n = 39). SHapley Additive exPlanations was the most common interpretability method (n = 66, 37%). Only 26% of studies included external validation, and just 19% adhered to TRIPOD guidelines.

Por que isso importa

AI models demonstrate superior predictive performance in cardiac surgery compared with traditional risk scores, but concerns regarding validation, transparency, and generalizability must be addressed to enable implementation.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Perioperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review

Jason Ha, Hunaid A Vohra

Descritores MeSH

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures
  • Predictive Learning Models
  • Prediction Algorithms
  • Humans
  • Machine Learning
  • Risk Assessment
  • Random Forest
  • Boosting Machine Learning Algorithms

Veja também

Estudos relacionados