ScienceMed®

Infusão contínua versus infusão intermitente de vancomicina: uma revisão sistemática e metanálise com foco em nefrotoxicidade, alcance alvo e desfechos clínicos

Medicina
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Túbulos renais em corte transversal, revestidos por epitélio cúbico, ao microscópio óptico. Berkshire Community College Bioscience Image Library · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaFrontiers in pharmacology14 out 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Vancomycin is widely used for Gram-positive infections but has a narrow therapeutic window and significant nephrotoxicity risk. Whether continuous infusion (CI) offers advantages over intermittent infusion (II) remains debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CI versus II vancomycin regarding nephrotoxicity, target attainment, clinical outcomes, and time to therapeutic target. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing CI and II of vancomycin were included. Outcomes assessed were nephrotoxicity, target concentration attainment, clinical efficacy, microbiological clearance, mortality, and time to therapeutic target. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. A total of 23 studies comprising 3,053 patients were included. CI was associated with significantly reduced nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.48-0.79, I2 = 42%), higher target attainment (OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 2.12-3.84, I2 = 38%), and shorter time to therapeutic target (MD = -1.52 days, 95% CI = -1.98 to -1.06, I2 = 67%). No significant differences were observed for clinical efficacy (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.86-1.46), microbiological clearance (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.72-1.62), or mortality (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.71-1.25). Continuous infusion of vancomycin reduces nephrotoxicity risk, improves target attainment, and shortens time to therapeutic target compared with intermittent infusion, without compromising clinical efficacy or survival. These findings support CI as a preferred strategy in patients at heightened risk of renal injury. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261365683, identifier CRD420261365683.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion of vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on nephrotoxicity, target attainment, and clinical outcomes

Xunuo Ma, Leiting Xu, Jianfei Zhang, Xiudi Wu, Tao Tao

Estudos relacionados