How Prominent Are Gender Bias, Racial Bias, and Score Inflation in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review
Saúde PúblicaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Revisão sistemática
- Nível de evidência
- 1 · Evidência consolidada
- Revista
- Clinical orthopaedics and related research
- Publicado em
- 17 abr 2024
- Citações
- 7
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
How Prominent Are Gender Bias, Racial Bias, and Score Inflation in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review
Robert J Burkhart, Monish S Lavu, Christian J Hecht, Jason G Ina, Robert J Gillespie, Raymond W Liu
Descritores MeSH
- Internship and Residency
- Racism
- Sexism
- Orthopedics
- Female
- School Admission Criteria
- Correspondence as Topic
- Personnel Selection
- Humans
- Male
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Systematic Review of Gender Differences in Reference Letters for Postgraduate Surgical Training Programs
- Racial and Ethnic Bias in Letters of Recommendation in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review
- Is the Completion of a Research Gap Year or Summer Research Program Associated With Increased Odds of Matching Into Orthopaedic Residency? A Systematic Review
- Evidence-Based Practices for Interviewing Graduate Medical Education Applicants: A Systematic Review