
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force of three differently constructed bars on two implants retaining mandibular overdenture - one year follow-up (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
Medicina e TecnologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
Different bar construction techniques will affect the bar passive fitness, which may induce stresses or strain on the implant and/or tightening screw and sequentially may affect the biting force and patient satisfaction.
This clinical investigation assessed patient satisfaction and maximum biting force (MBF) using three differently constructed (conventional casting, milling, and 3D printing CAD/CAM techniques) cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) bar-retained implants mandibular overdentures over a one-year period of follow-up.
Thirty edentulous patients seeking for two implants bar-retained mandibular overdentures were randomly assigned into three groups as the following: Group I: 10 patients received a Co-Cr conventional casting bar, Group II: 10 patients received a Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar, and Group III: 10 patients received a Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D-printed bar. All the bar groups were connected to two implants in the canine area bilaterally. Within the first two weeks following implant placement, patients received the definitive prosthesis. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using the (OHIP-EDENT-19) questionnaire form after 6, and 12 months. Additionally, the maximum biting force was tested at after delivery, 3, 6, and 12 months for each group. The results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed.
This study was recorded on ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively registered (ID: NCT06401187) on 30/04/2024.
O que encontraram
After one year follow up, regrading patient satisfaction the three groups showed no statistically significant difference. Although, the functional limitation domain was in favor of the milled bar. Regarding the maximum biting force, no statistically significant difference was found among three groups. However, at 12 mouths follow-up the milled bar showed statistically value.
Por que isso importa
Within the limitations of this study, the conventional, milled and 3D printed bar overdentures groups can be used as a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous mandible in terms of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force of three differently constructed bars on two implants retaining mandibular overdenture - one year follow-up (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
Amr Mohamed Ismail Badr, Mona Nabawy, Gehan Fekry Mohammed, Shaimaa Ahmed Radwan
Descritores MeSH
- Denture, Overlay
- Bite Force
- Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
- Patient Satisfaction
- Humans
- Jaw, Edentulous
- Male
- Mandible
- Middle Aged
- Computer-Aided Design
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Um estudo clínico prospectivo randomizado para avaliar os resultados do tratamento com implantes mandibulares Overdentures apoiados por um implante dentário de titânio paralelo ou típer colocado de acordo com o protocolo de carregamento imediato: Um relatório de acompanhamento de 12 meses
- Mandibular two-implant overdentures with CAD-CAM milled bars with distal extensions or retentive anchors: A randomized controlled trial
- Resultados Radiográficos Comparando Mini-implante- versus Sobredentações Convencionais de Implantes Retidos com Diferentes Sistemas de Anexos: Um Ensaio Clínico Controlado Randomizado
- Two- Versus Four-Narrow-Implant-Retained Dentures With Immediate-Loaded Anterior Implants: 9 Years Randomized Clinical Trial