ScienceMed®

Estresse traumático secundário e sofrimento psíquico entre os respondedores aos terremotos de 2023 Kahramanamaraş: revisão sistemática e meta-análise

Psiquiatria
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Cerebelo de embrião de camundongo, em microscopia de fluorescência. NIH · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

MetanáliseNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaFrontiers in public health8 out 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

The Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on February 6, 2023 prompted one of the largest disaster response operations on record. Responders faced repeated exposure to death and distress, and locally recruited personnel were often disaster-affected themselves. Existing syntheses of this event excluded responders

Following PRISMA 2020 (PROSPERO-registered), seven Turkish and English sources were searched for studies on psychological outcomes among responders to these earthquakes. The primary outcome was secondary traumatic stress. Outcomes were pooled in random-effects models (restricted maximum likelihood, Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman adjustment); prevalence after Freeman–Tukey transformation. Personal exposure was a pre-specified moderator

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261289019 , identifier CRD420261289019

O que encontraram

Twenty-one studies were included; 13 quantitative studies contributed data on 2,894 responders. The pooled Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale total across four studies was 44.37 (95% CI 32.25–56.50; I 2 = 99.2%). Heterogeneity appeared partly attributable to personal exposure: personnel resident in or affected by the disaster zone scored 48.80 against 38.40 among deployed personnel, an imprecisely estimated difference of 10.40 points (95% CI 1.57–19.23), with τ 2 falling from 46.96 to 8.22 among deployed personnel. Pooled prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder across three studies was 14.5% (8.5–21.5). Within the largest sample, personal exposure predicted secondary traumatic stress in graded fashion: physical injury Hedges’ g = 0.99, home destruction g = 0.70, bereavement g = 0.41

Por que isso importa

Whether the responder was also a victim was the most consistent modifier of outcome. Its direction was consistent, but its magnitude was imprecise and possibly small. Task allocation and post-deployment monitoring should be organized around personal exposure rather than professional role alone

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress among responders to the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Metin Çınaroğlu, Eda Yılmazer

Descritores MeSH

  • Compassion Fatigue
  • Psychological Distress
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
  • Earthquakes
  • Emergency Responders
  • Humans

Veja também

Estudos relacionados