Eficácia e segurança da insulina icodec em comparação com a insulina efsitora em pacientes com diabetes tipo 2: revisão sistemática e meta-análise em rede
EndocrinologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
We conducted this network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin icodec vs insulin efsitora for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
We conducted a comprehensive systematic search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase up to November 11, 2025. Eligible trials compared insulin icodec and insulin efsitora against each other, placebo or other glucose-lowering drugs. Primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were change in body weight, percentage of patients achieving HbA1c < 7%, change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and safety outcomes including level 1 hypoglycemia, level 2 or level 3 hypoglycemia, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the risk of bias. A frequentist network meta-analysis was used to calculate the risk ratios or mean difference with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251177019.
O que encontraram
Thirteen RCTs involving 7,402 participants were included. Insulin icodec resulted in a lower HbA1c level compared to insulin efsitora, but was associated with a higher incidence of level 1 hypoglycemia. The two treatments showed no significant differences in other outcomes, including change in body weight, percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <7%, change in FPG, incidence of level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia, AEs, and SAEs. Compared to daily insulins, insulin icodec led to lower HbA1c levels. Weight gain was lower with insulin glargine than with insulin icodec. A higher percentage of patients in the icodec group achieved HbA1c <7% compared to those receiving daily insulins. Regarding safety outcomes, insulin degludec had a lower incidence of both level 1 and level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia than the other three insulins. Insulin icodec showed a higher incidence of level 1 hypoglycemia than insulin glargine. Additionally, the incidence of AEs was higher with insulin icodec than with insulin degludec.
Por que isso importa
In patients with T2D, once-weekly insulin icodec may provide slightly better glycaemic control than daily insulin. Insulin icodec was more effective than insulin efsitora in reducing HbA1c levels; however, this benefit was offset by a significantly higher risk of level 1 hypoglycemia. The two insulins were comparable in terms of body weight change, glycemic target achievement, FPG reduction, and safety profiles, including level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia, AEs, and SAEs. Direct head to head RCTs are warranted to confirm these findings.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Efficacy and safety of insulin icodec compared with insulin efsitora in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Jingxin Li, Junxia Wen, Hao Zheng, Cuilu Quan, Jiajie Bi, Yajing Yang, Jing Zhang, Yanhong Shen
Descritores MeSH
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Hypoglycemic Agents
- Insulin, Long-Acting
- Insulin
- Hypoglycemia
- Recombinant Fusion Proteins
- Treatment Outcome
- Insulin Glargine
- Insulins
- Blood Glucose
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Glycaemic Control According to the Final Insulin Dose Using an Innovative Fixed-Dose Titration of Weekly Insulin Efsitora in Insulin-Naïve Type 2 Diabetes
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with basal insulin: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of non-Asian studies
- Efficacy and safety of combination of semaglutide and basal insulin in patients with of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis