ScienceMed®

Eficácia do anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mais quimioterapia no adenocarcinoma gástrico HER2-negativo avançado sem tratamento prévio entre diferentes intervalos PD-L1: uma meta-análise atualizada e uma análise individual dos dados a nível do paciente reconstruída

Oncologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Linfócito T humano ao microscópio eletrônico de varredura (colorizado). NIAID · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

MetanáliseNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaBMC medicine8 ago 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) has become the frontline therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEAC). However, emerging evidence suggests that clinical benefit is primarily derived from patients with a high combined positive score (CPS), whereas the efficacy of CIT among different CPS intervals remained unknown.

A systemic literature search was performed to screen for RCTs studying addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in metastatic GEAC with efficacy information across different CPS interval. Pooled analysis of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) and heterogeneity analysis on treatment efficacy were performed in CPS < 1, 1 ~ 4, 5 ~ 9, ≥10 subgroups.

O que encontraram

The analysis showed that adding programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors to ChT significantly improved overall survival (OS) in the CPS ≥ 10 subgroup (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95%CI 0.61-0.73]), but not in the CPS interaction < 0.0001). Additionally, CIT significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in both CPS-low (CPS < 1: HR, 0.85 [95%CI 0.72-1.00]; odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95%CI 1.02-1.96]) and CPS-high (CPS ≥ 10: HR, 0.64 [95%CI 0.58-0.70]; OR, 1.87 [95%CI 1.50-2.33]) subgroups versus ChT alone.

Por que isso importa

CPS ≥ 10 defines a subgroup deriving the greatest benefit from CIT, supporting its use as a clinically informative threshold for PD-1 inhibitor therapy in advanced GEAC. Nevertheless, patients with CPS < 10 may still gain benefit from CIT when tumor shrinkage is the primary treatment objective.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve advanced HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma among different PD-L1 intervals: an updated meta-analysis and reconstructed individual patient-level data analysis

Yu-Kun Chen, Wen-Wei Wu, Fan Chen, Lan-Jie Chen, Hao-Xiang Wu, Ying-Nan Wang, Ying Jin, Yu-Tong Chen, Zi-Xian Wang

Descritores MeSH

  • Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Stomach Neoplasms
  • B7-H1 Antigen
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Humans
  • Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
  • Treatment Outcome

Veja também

Estudos relacionados