
Eficácia comparativa de fruquintinib, regorafenib ou TAS-102 em pacientes com câncer colorretal metastático mutante do KRAS: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise em rede
OncologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
This study aimed to synthesize evidence from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of regorafenib, fruquintinib, and TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Using a network meta-analysis, we compared long-term survival outcomes (overall and progression-free survival) in the overall population and in patients with KRAS mutations, to guide treatment decisions and inform therapy selection in molecularly defined subgroups.
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 6 November 2025 for randomized controlled trials reporting overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB-2 tool and heterogeneity with I2. A Bayesian network meta-analysis using non-informative normal priors and a random-effects consistency model was fitted; convergence was assessed with the Gelman-Rubin diagnostic. Comparative safety was not formally meta-analyzed.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420251275994, identifier CRD420251275994.
O que encontraram
Ten RCTs (n = 3959) were included, with no randomized head-to-head comparisons among the active treatments. Compared with placebo, all active treatments significantly improved overall survival (OS): fruquintinib HR 0.66 (95% CrI 0.53-0.84), regorafenib HR 0.69 (95% CrI 0.51-0.88), TAS-102 HR 0.69 (95% CrI 0.55-0.85), and TAS-102 plus bevacizumab HR 0.41 (95% CrI 0.28-0.59). Combination therapy ranked first; indirect differences among the three single agents were not consistently statistically significant. In patients with KRAS-mutant tumors, fruquintinib and TAS-102 were associated with numerically favorable OS estimates compared with placebo [HR 0.71 (95% CrI 0.51-1.01) and 0.74 (95% CrI 0.50-0.99), respectively], whereas regorafenib did not [HR 0.81 (95% CrI 0.52-1.19)]. These statistical differences versus placebo do not demonstrate superiority over regorafenib, and rank probabilities are exploratory.
Por que isso importa
Fruquintinib and TAS-102 plus bevacizumab are effective later-line options for mCRC. In patients with KRAS-mutant CRC, fruquintinib may be a reasonable option, but available indirect evidence does not establish its superiority over TAS-102 or regorafenib. These findings provide a trial-level, KRAS-stratified synthesis of the available placebo-controlled RCT evidence and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, rather than as evidence of a predictive effect of KRAS status or of rank-based superiority among the agents.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Comparative efficacy of fruquintinib, regorafenib or TAS-102 in patients with KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Yingyu Zhou, Shiqing Zhao, Xiaoyi Zheng, Yixuan Wang, Mingzhen Wang, Siyu Chen, Zhenan Wu, Dong Zang, Wenzhe Si
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- The efficacy and safety of regorafenib/fruquintinib combined with PD-1/PD-L1 for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis based on single-arm studies
- Colon Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis