ScienceMed®

Efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Nefrologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Glomérulo renal ao microscópio óptico. Mikael Häggström · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaFrontiers in immunology8 fev 202418 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show a significant overall survival advantage over standard advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) therapies, tumor response to these agents remains poor. Some studies have shown that combination therapy including an ICI appears to be the best treatment; however, the overall benefit in terms of efficacy and toxicity still needs to be assessed. Thus, we performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of several combinations that include an ICI to provide a basis for clinical treatment selection.

We conducted a thorough search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for articles from January 2010 to June 2023. R 4.4.2 and STATA 16.0 were used to analyze data; hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the results.

https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202410078.

O que encontraram

An indirect comparison showed that nivolumab plus cabozantinib and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib were the most effective treatments for progression-free survival (PFS), with no significant differences between the two interventions (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.96-1.78; P=0.08); rank probability showed that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib had a 57.1% chance of being the preferred treatment. In the absence of indirect comparisons between pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, avelumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, pembrolizumab plus axitinib (40.2%) was the best treatment option for overall survival (OS). Compared to pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (OR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.65; P=0.02) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.00-0.78; P<0.001) had a lower incidence of overall adverse events (AEs).

Por que isso importa

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib and pembrolizumab plus axitinib resulted in the highest PFS and OS rates, respectively. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib may be the best option when AEs are a concern.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Xiangyu Chen, Zhunan Xu, Changgui Wu, Lijun Xie, Pengyu Wang, Xiaoqiang Liu

Descritores MeSH

  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Kidney Neoplasms
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Phenylurea Compounds
  • Pyridines
  • Quinolines
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Nivolumab
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

Veja também