ScienceMed®

Efficacy and safety of Programmed Death Ligand 1 inhibitors versus Programmed Death 1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Oncologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Linfócito T humano ao microscópio eletrônico de varredura (colorizado). NIAID · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

MetanáliseNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaPeerJ7 jul 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first-line treatment of driver mutation-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) between PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors.

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the first-line treatment of NSCLC with ICIs alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs.

O que encontraram

In total, 28 RCTs involving 14,758 patients were included. Compared with Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy, Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with worse OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.13-1.41]; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.21; 95% CI [1.06-1.38]; P = 0.005). The objective response rate (ORR) did not differ between PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR) = 0.91; 95% CI [0.78-1.05], P = 0.205), and AE rates were similar between these groups. Regarding monotherapy, no difference in OS, PFS, or ORR was observed between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors. The incidence of AEs leading to treatment termination and grade ≥3 AEs was lower for PD-L1 inhibitors than PD-1 inhibitors (risk ratio (RR) = 0.55; 95% CI [0.32-0.95]; P = 0.03; RR = 0.76; 95% CI [0.60-0.96]; P = 0.021).

Por que isso importa

The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy may provide a significant OS and PFS benefit relative to PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in NSCLC and a similar safety profile. Meanwhile, PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy appears less likely to result in treatment termination or grade ≥3 AEs than PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Efficacy and safety of Programmed Death Ligand 1 inhibitors versus Programmed Death 1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cui Dang, Jingzhang Li, Hong Chen, Zoujie Luo

Descritores MeSH

  • Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • B7-H1 Antigen
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Humans

Veja também