Efficacy and safety of papillary vs non-papillary access to the calyces in patients undergoing percutaneous lithotripsy: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis
NefrologiaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Metanálise
- Nível de evidência
- 1 · Evidência consolidada
- Revista
- International urology and nephrology
- Publicado em
- 2 mai 2026
- Citações
- 0
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Efficacy and safety of papillary vs non-papillary access to the calyces in patients undergoing percutaneous lithotripsy: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis
Fahad Amin, Ammad Abid, Waleeja Rehaam, Tehreem Talab, Faheem Ullah, Zainab Saleem, Mahnoor Sultana, Abu-Bakr Ahmed
Descritores MeSH
- Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
- Kidney Calculi
- Kidney Calices
- Lithotripsy
- Humans
- Treatment Outcome
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Effectiveness and safety of ultra-slow full power shockwave lithotripsy compared to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of lower calyceal stone between 1 and 2 cm with high attenuation value
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy, complication rate and recurrence rate in management of pediatric renal stone, a prospective randomized trial
- Modalities of management of residual upper calyceal stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stone: A randomized controlled trial
- Efficacy and safety of tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheath-assisted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 1-3 cm simple lower calyceal calculi: a prospective randomized controlled trial