
Efficacy and safety of first-line targeted and immunotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis
GastroenterologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
As targeted therapies and immunotherapy become increasingly prevalent in treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), comparative analyses are essential to determine the most effective and safe treatment combinations. This study aims to compare and rank the efficacy and safety profiles of first-line systemic treatments for mCRC.
This network meta-analysis was conducted in compliance with PRISMA guidelines, reviewing randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through March 2024. A network meta-analysis is conducted using a Bayesian random effects mode. After the data was extracted, data analysis was conducted in gemtc R. The primary outcomes measured were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) graded ≥3.The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of each study.
These findings underscore the importance of integrating targeted drugs and immunotherapy in first-line mCRC treatments, highlighting significant differences in efficacy and safety profiles that can guide therapeutic decisions.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024604107, identifier CRD42024604107.
O que encontraram
A total of 61 RCTs involving 20,579 patients were included. The results showed that FOLFOXIRI combined with bevacizumab and atezolizumab significantly improved PFS and OS, with HRs for PFS and OS of (HR:0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.33), (HR:0.48, 95% CI: 0.30-0.78), respectively. The incidence of ≥ Grade 3 AEs was high, but no new fatal treatment-related AEs were observed, and the safety of this regimen was manageable. FOLFOXIRI in combination with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody regimens showed significant PFS and OS improvements in the RAS/BRAF wild-type subgroup. For the subgroup of patients aged ≥ 70 years, thetrifluorouridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab regimen also had some advantage in PFS and OS. Although the incidence of Grade ≥ 3 AEs was higher, the incidence of AEs was similar across age groups and well tolerated in this regimen, and it was more suitable for elderly cancer patients.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Efficacy and safety of first-line targeted and immunotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis
Liman Huo, Hongyu Yue, Ruixia Yang, Xiaoli Sun, Ziyue Wang, Hong Liu, Jiang Liu, Rui Feng, Ping Liang
Descritores MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Immunotherapy
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Treatment Outcome
- Molecular Targeted Therapy
- Bevacizumab
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
- Humans
- Neoplasm Metastasis
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapeutics or immunotherapy agents combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Chronological survival improvement over time with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus targeted agents in metastatic colorectal cancer: An ARCAD database study
- Tislelizumab efficacy and safety compared to other anti-PD-1s: a network meta-analysis of first-line therapies for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
- Therapeutic efficacy of multiple neoadjuvant regimens involving targeted therapy, immunotherapy and chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis