ScienceMed®

Effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Infectologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Radiografia de tórax de pulmões saudáveis. N.a. Radiology by Dr. Johan Verbeken. Scan and image editing by Vincent Mia Edie Verheyen · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaBMJ open7 mai 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

The aim of this study is to evaluate existing evidence on the effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for community-acquired pneumonia in children and adults.

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Ovid-MEDLINER were searched with no language restrictions through 16 July 2024.

We included studies comparing the effectiveness of amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate versus other antibiotics or placebo.

Only randomised controlled trials comparing amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate with another antibiotic or placebo with a primary outcome of clinical resolution or clinical failure were eligible for our review. We used random-effects and fixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate the pooled treatment effect size. Heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the τ statistic. We performed an unplanned frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis for the indirect comparison between amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials was used to assess and categorise studies into low risk of bias, some concerns or high risk of bias.

CRD42024568554.

O que encontraram

We extracted data from 44 studies including 45 400 patients. We found no evidence of a differential effect on clinical resolution when comparing amoxicillin with other antibiotics (n=15 trials; pooled OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.38, where >1 favours amoxicillin) or amoxicillin-clavulanate with other antibiotics (n=17; OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.04). Similarly, evidence of difference in clinical failure between amoxicillin and other antibiotics was unclear and unable to rule out clinically important benefits or harms (n=8; OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06, where 1 favours amoxicillin-clavulanate). Sixty-three per cent and 29% of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate studies, respectively, had low risk of bias according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials.

Por que isso importa

Current evidence is unclear as to whether amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate differs from other antibiotics, or from each other, in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, owing to the small number of trials and substantial heterogeneity in comparators used across study settings.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults and children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lilia Potter-Schwartz, Myo Mm Swe, Michael Sharland, Julia Anna Bielicki, Ben S Cooper, Cherry Lim

Descritores MeSH

  • Community-Acquired Pneumonia
  • Amoxicillin
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Adult
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Community-Acquired Infections

Veja também