Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach
MedicinaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
The assessment of the accuracy of flapless placement of zygomatic implants in edentulous maxilla using dynamic navigation.
A randomized controlled trial was carried out on 20 patients. Patients were randomized into two groups, the flapless (Group 1; n=10) and the conventional (Group 2; n=10). In each case two zygomatic implants were inserted under local anaesthesia, one on the right and one on the left side guided by a dynamic navigation system. The surgical procedure was identical in the two groups except for the reflection of the mucoperiosteal flap which was eliminated in the flapless cases. Postoperative CBCT scans were used to assess the accuracy of the placement of zygomatic implants.
O que encontraram
Osseointegration was achieved for all the implants, except one case in the flapless group. Statistically significant differences in the accuracy of the position of the zygomatic implants was found between the flapless and the conventional groups, measured at the apex and the entry points of the implants (p < 0.01). The average apical and coronal deviations were 5 mm and 3 mm, respectively; the angular deviation was 6°, and 2 mm vertical apical disparity was detected between the planned and the achieved surgical position. Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane was noted in three cases, one in flapless group and two in the conventional group.
Por que isso importa
Flapless placement of zygomatic implants guided by dynamic navigation offered satisfactory safety and accuracy.
This is the first clinical trial to prove the feasibility and accuracy of flapless placement of zygomatic implant with minimal morbidity. The study highlights the innovative reflection of the Schneiderian membrane under guided surgical navigation. The procedure can be performed under local anaesthesia, which offers clinical advantages. Adequate training on the use of dynamic navigation is mandatory before its use in clinical cases.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach
Ashwini Bhalerao, Madhulaxmi Marimuthu, Abdul Wahab, Ashraf Ayoub
Descritores MeSH
- Mouth, Edentulous
- Dental Implants
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
- Humans
- Maxilla
Estudos relacionados
- Trueness of fully guided versus partially guided implant placement in edentulous maxillary rehabilitation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial
- Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years
- Evaluation of 3-Dimensional accuracy of guided implant placement using guided osteoperiosteal flap versus guided ridge splitting for atrophic maxillary augmentation (a randomized clinical trial)
- Comparative evaluation of accuracy between dynamic navigation and freehand method during orthodontic implant placement: a split-mouth study