ScienceMed®

Diagnostic testing accuracy of DNA methylation tests for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Células em divisão (mitose), em microscopia de fluorescência. ZEISS Microscopy · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

MetanáliseNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)27 mai 20263 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical screening offers stronger protection against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) than screening with cytology. DNA methylation tests have been proposed as an alternative triage test to cytology, although there is currently no consensus on the most accurate gene or gene panels ("markers").

We conducted a meta-analysis of accuracy of human and HPV methylation markers to detect CIN2 or worse (CIN2+), CIN3+, and cervical cancer (CRD42022299760). We systematically searched three databases to March 2025. We used a bivariate random-effects model to produce pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-) for each marker at each available endpoint. Our primary analysis was in HPV+ women, and secondary analysis included all data regardless of HPV positivity.

O que encontraram

We included 51 studies exploring 13 methylation markers in 28,977 HPV+ women, and in total 125 studies assessing 32 markers in 49,242 women. For HPV+, the markers with the highest DORs were JAM3 (20.82 [95%CI 14.41-30.08]), C13ORF18 (19.50 [95%CI 11.65-32.65]), and PAX1 (17.13 [95%CI 9.20-31.89]). EPB41L3 had the lowest LR- (0.26 [95%CI 0.19-0.35]). In all women, SOX1 had the highest DOR (29.72 [95%CI 12.84-68.81]), although JAM3 and PAX1 maintained good accuracy (DORs 26.73 [95%CI 19.97-35.77] and 23.96 [95%CI 17.32-33.15]).

Por que isso importa

Several methylation markers reported good sensitivity in the detection of CIN3+ whilst maintaining high specificity. These have potential to reduce unnecessary referrals to colposcopy. Methylation markers may permit efficient triage on self-samples which are inappropriate for cytology, although this requires further study ideally in screening cohorts.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Diagnostic testing accuracy of DNA methylation tests for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Laura Burney Ellis, Jack Tighe, Sarah J Bowden, Konstantinos S Kechagias, Maria Paraskevaidi, Akanksha Garg, Evangelos Paraskevaidis, Marc Arbyn, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Ilkka Kalliala et al.

Descritores MeSH

  • Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • DNA Methylation
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Human Papillomavirus Viruses
  • Papillomavirus Infections

Veja também