Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
PediatriaSobre o estudo
- Desenho
- Metanálise
- Nível de evidência
- 1 · Evidência consolidada
- Revista
- American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM
- Publicado em
- 10 dez 2023
- Citações
- 15
O resumo deste estudo é do publisher e não tem licença aberta: por isso mostramos aqui só os dados do estudo, e o texto fica na fonte original, nos links abaixo.
O estudo original
Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hiba J Mustafa, Ali Javinani, Vandana Muralidharan, Asma Khalil
Descritores MeSH
- Fetal Growth Retardation
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases
- Humans
- Infant
- Infant, Newborn
- Infant, Small for Gestational Age
- Pregnancy
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal
- Female
- Fetal Weight
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Adverse neonatal outcomes in small-for-gestational age twins identified using twin vs singleton growth charts: systematic review and meta-analysis
- A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction
- Severe smallness as predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in suspected late small-for-gestational-age fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Angiogenic factors versus fetomaternal Doppler for fetal growth restriction at term: an open-label, randomized controlled trial