ScienceMed®

Consequences of using poly-ether-ether-ketone versus traditional implant on tibial cement penetration and short-term clinical outcomes during total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Ortopedia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Radiografia histórica de um joelho (1896). Wellcome Collection · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research9 ago 20236 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

The use of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) prosthesis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a relatively new concept. Several studies have suggested that the thickness of cement penetration during TKA may affect the stability of the implants. The present study aimed to compare the cement penetration and clinical performance between PEEK and traditional cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) prosthesis during TKA.

This study was a randomized controlled trial with level I of evidence. A total of 48 patients were randomly assigned to either the PEEK group (n = 24) or the CoCrMo group (n = 24). Mean bone cement penetration under the tibial baseplate was assessed radiographically in four zones in the anteroposterior view and two zones in the lateral view, in accordance with the Knee Society Scoring System. Furthermore, parameters such as the Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, complications and survivorship at 1 year postoperatively were also compared.

O que encontraram

According to the results of this study, the mean bone cement penetration exhibited no significant difference between PEEK and CoCrMo groups (2.49 ± 0.61 mm vs. 2.53 ± 0.68 mm, p = 0.85). Additionally, there were no remarkable differences in the KSS clinical score, functional score, and VAS score between the two groups. Moreover, complications and survivorship were also statistically compared between the groups and presented no significant differences.

Por que isso importa

Based on the current findings, it can be concluded that PEEK implant present similar bone cement penetration, short-term clinical outcomes, and survivorship with traditional CoCrMo implant in TKA without added complications. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100047563).

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Consequences of using poly-ether-ether-ketone versus traditional implant on tibial cement penetration and short-term clinical outcomes during total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Guanghui Zhao, Shuxin Yao, Xiangxiang Sun, Jianbing Ma, Jianpeng Wang

Descritores MeSH

  • Knee Prosthesis
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Ethers
  • Ethyl Ethers
  • Humans
  • Benzophenones
  • Knee Joint
  • Polymers
  • Treatment Outcome

Veja também

Estudos relacionados