ScienceMed®

Comparing botulinum toxin and biofeedback therapies for awake bruxism: a randomized clinical trial

Ortopedia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Feixes de músculo esquelético em cortes longitudinal e transversal, ao microscópio óptico. Berkshire Community College Bioscience Image Library · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaBMC oral health11 nov 20251 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Behavioral therapy using electromyography-based biofeedback (BIO) and botulinum toxin type A (BTA) injections are potential treatments for managing awake bruxism (AB) in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of BIO and BTA in reducing AB behaviors, pain intensity, and psychosocial distress in individuals with TMD.

This single-center, single-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial enrolled 40 adults with TMD diagnosed with AB. AB was assessed using the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) and smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). Participants presenting an AB frequency of ≥ 60% were randomly allocated to receive BIO or BTA intervention. Pain intensity was measured by the Characteristic Pain Intensity (CPI) score, and psychosocial status was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-9, PHQ-15) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7). Assessments were conducted at baseline, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U for AB behaviors, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for within-group comparisons, and the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post hoc test for between-group comparisons.

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), RBR-62cftbp. Registered on January 9, 2024.

O que encontraram

Intra-group comparisons showed a significant reduction in BIO group for sustained teeth contact (BIO: p = 0.004) and EMA-assessed AB global behavior (BIO: p = 0.008). No significant improvements were found in BTA group for the same variables in all follow-ups (p > 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between groups in all follow-ups for OBC and EMA scores (p > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups for CPI (p = 0.39) or psychosocial outcomes (p > 0.05).

Por que isso importa

Even though neither intervention improved pain nor psychosocial outcomes, BIO significantly reduced AB behaviors, indicating that BIO may be preferable for controlling AB behaviors in TMD patients.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Comparing botulinum toxin and biofeedback therapies for awake bruxism: a randomized clinical trial

Tatiana Ferreira Foscaldo, Paulo Henrique Dos Santos Belo Junior, Giselle Rodrigues Ribeiro, Leilane Samary de Proença, Giancarlo De la Torre Canales, Plinio Mendes Senna

Descritores MeSH

  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Biofeedback, Psychology
  • Neuromuscular Agents
  • Botulinum Toxins, Type A
  • Bruxism
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain Measurement
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Adult

Veja também