ScienceMed®

Comparative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab and other programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors in first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Gastroenterologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Células HeLa em cultura, em microscopia de fluorescência. NIH · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association4 out 20255 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Several programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors are approved for the first-line treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer, including pembrolizumab, nivolumab and, more recently, tislelizumab. Since direct comparisons between these agents are lacking, advanced statistical modeling can be utilized to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab compared with other first-line immunotherapy regimens in this indication.

A systematic literature review was performed to identify and summarize published randomized controlled trials investigating first-line treatments in adult patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. Relevant trials were synthesized using a Bayesian network meta-analysis; fixed-effect models were conducted for all analyses. The network meta-analysis base case used the intent-to-treat populations for tislelizumab + chemotherapy and placebo + chemotherapy from RATIONALE-305.

O que encontraram

Key comparators included nivolumab + chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-4, CheckMate 649), and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-062, KEYNOTE-859). Tislelizumab + chemotherapy demonstrated similar efficacy compared with nivolumab + chemotherapy and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy for both overall survival and progression-free survival. Tislelizumab + chemotherapy was associated with significantly lower odds of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events compared with nivolumab + chemotherapy, and there were no statistically significant differences between tislelizumab + chemotherapy compared with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.

Por que isso importa

Overall, these analyses suggest that tislelizumab + chemotherapy is similarly efficacious to pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and nivolumab + chemotherapy, and is associated with a similar or lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events in the first-line treatment of gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Comparative efficacy and safety of tislelizumab and other programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors in first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Jaffer A Ajani, Maria Alsina, Markus Moehler, Keun-Wook Lee, Wenxi Tang, Jason Steenkamp, Emily Prentiss, Kaijun Wang, Becky Hooper, Lin Zhan

Descritores MeSH

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
  • Esophageal Neoplasms
  • Esophagogastric Junction
  • Stomach Neoplasms
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Humans

Veja também

Estudos relacionados