ScienceMed®

Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Results from a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis

Oncologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Células HeLa em cultura, em microscopia de fluorescência. NIH · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaCancer treatment reviews6 set 202229 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

The objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic melanoma using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

A systematic literature review (SLR) identified studies in Medline, Embase and Cochrane published until November 2020. Screening used prespecified eligibility criteria. Following a transitivity assessment across included studies, Bayesian NMA was conducted.

O que encontraram

A total of 43 publications reporting 15 targeted therapy trials and 42 reporting 18 immunotherapy trials were retained from the SLR and considered for the NMA. Due to substantial between-study heterogeneity with immunotherapy trials, the analysis considered a network restricted to targeted therapies. Among combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib was superior to dabrafenib + trametinib for overall response rate (OR = 1.86; 95 % credible interval [CrI] 1.10, 3.17), superior to vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR = 0.51; 95 % CrI 0.29, 0.91) and fewer discontinuations due to AEs (OR = 0.45; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.96), and superior to atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib with fewer SAEs (OR = 0.41; 95 % CrI 0.21, 0.82). Atezolizumab + vemurafenib + cobimetinib and encorafenib + binimetinib were generally comparable for efficacy endpoints. Among double combination therapies, encorafenib + binimetinib showed high probabilities of being better for all efficacy and safety endpoints.

Por que isso importa

This NMA confirms that combination therapies are more efficacious than monotherapies. Encorafenib + binimetinib has a favourable efficacy profile compared to other double combination therapies and a favourable safety profile compared to both double and triple combination therapies.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted therapies for BRAF-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Results from a systematic literature review and a network meta-analysis

Pippa Corrie, Nicolas Meyer, Rossana Berardi, Massimo Guidoboni, Maximilian Schlueter, Spyros Kolovos, Bérengère Macabeo, Jean-Baptiste Trouiller, Philippe Laramée

Descritores MeSH

  • Melanoma
  • Neoplasms, Second Primary
  • Skin Neoplasms
  • Benzimidazoles
  • Carbamates
  • Humans
  • Mutation
  • Sulfonamides
  • Vemurafenib
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Veja também