ScienceMed®

Comparando o niraparibe versus a quimioterapia dupla platina-taxano como tratamento neoadjuvante em pacientes com câncer do ovário com deficiência em fase III/IV da recombinação homóloga recentemente diagnosticada: Achados da coorte C do ensaio OPAL de fase 2

Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Células HeLa em cultura, em microscopia de fluorescência. NIH · domínio público · Wikimedia Commons

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaGynecologic oncology20 ago 20260 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Despite therapeutic improvements in advanced ovarian cancer (aOC), prognosis remains poor for patients with residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. Reported here are results from cohort C of the phase 1b/2 OPAL study of a neoadjuvant poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor for aOC.

Eligible adults with newly diagnosed stage III/IV homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) aOC and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 were randomized 1:1 to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane chemotherapy (platinum-taxane) or niraparib. During the prescreening period, patients received 1 run-in cycle of carboplatin-paclitaxel. After neoadjuvant therapy, patients with an unconfirmed complete/partial response (CR/PR) or stable disease per RECIST could undergo interval debulking surgery (IDS), followed by adjuvant platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy. After adjuvant therapy, patients without progression received niraparib-based maintenance treatment. Primary endpoint was pre-IDS unconfirmed investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST. Secondary endpoints included safety.

O que encontraram

Of 36 patients randomized, 19 received niraparib and 17, platinum-taxane. Baseline demographics and characteristics were similar between arms. Overall, the pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR was 31.6% (CR/PR, 0/31.6%) with niraparib and 70.6% (CR/PR, 0/70.6%) with platinum-taxane. The pre-IDS unconfirmed ORR (80% CI) difference was -39.0% (-56.8% to -17.7%), favoring platinum-taxane. The trial was closed early for futility. Grade ≥3 adverse-event rates during the neoadjuvant period were 42% and 59% in the niraparib and platinum-taxane arms, respectively. No fatal serious adverse events occurred.

Por que isso importa

In newly diagnosed HRd aOC, neoadjuvant niraparib did not improve ORR versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy, and the trial was discontinued. The safety profile was consistent with those of previous PARP inhibitor studies.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination-deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: Findings from cohort C of the OPAL phase 2 trial

Shannon N Westin, Jimmy Belotte, Brunella Felicetti, Vishvajit Aghera, Ahmed YoussefAgha, Evi Bakirtzi, Ana Godoy Ortiz, Arantzazu Barquín García, Diane Provencher, Raúl Márquez Vázquez et al.

Descritores MeSH

  • Piperidines
  • Indazoles
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Carboplatin
  • Paclitaxel
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy

Veja também