ScienceMed®

Clinical performance and occlusal wear of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network and zirconia-reinforced ceramic implant-supported single crowns fabricated via a digital workflow on two titanium implant systems: a 12-month prospective randomized trial

Medicina e Tecnologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Pastilha de um circuito integrado Ferranti F111-L ao microscópio. Revaldinho · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaInternational journal of implant dentistry20 fev 20261 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramics are alternatives for implant-supported single crowns (ISCs). This prospective randomized trial evaluated 12-month survival of PICN- and ZLS-ISCs supported by Straumann Bone Level Tapered (BLT) and CAMLOG Promote plus (PP) titanium implants. Furthermore, technical complications and occlusal wear were analyzed.

Sixty-one patients received a single titanium implant from two different manufacturers, and one was treated with two implants. All implants were placed using fully guided static computer-assisted surgery. After randomization, screw-retained CAD-CAM ISCs were fabricated from PICN (n = 31) or ZLS (n = 31) and cemented onto stock titanium base abutments. After 1 year, implant and prosthetic survival, material- and system-dependent outcomes, technical complications, and occlusal wear-based on superimposed baseline and follow-up intraoral scans-were recorded. Independent t-tests were performed (p = 0.05).

Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS-ID: DRKS00026973).

O que encontraram

Forty-two ISCs were evaluated after one year (mean follow-up: 409.5 ± 102.6 days). PICN showed a 84% survival rate, while ZLS achieved 100% survival. Debonding occurred in five restorations (PICN = 2; ZLS = 3). No complications were observed in 86% of PICN and 85% of ZLS crowns. Occlusal wear was significantly greater for PICN (0.45 ± 0.38 mm) compared with ZLS (0.16 ± 0.05 mm; p = 0.03). Both crown fractures occurred on BLT implants (82% survival), whereas PP implants showed 100% survival.

Por que isso importa

ZLS demonstrated the highest survival rate and no irreparable failures, along with significantly lower occlusal wear. PICN showed more catastrophic fractures and greater wear. Technical complications were frequent for both materials, independent of implant system or abutment height.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Clinical performance and occlusal wear of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network and zirconia-reinforced ceramic implant-supported single crowns fabricated via a digital workflow on two titanium implant systems: a 12-month prospective randomized trial

Malte Bagratuni, Maria Bruhnke, Lauren Bohner, Insa Herklotz, Florian Beuer, Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse, Stefano Pieralli

Descritores MeSH

  • Crowns
  • Ceramics
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
  • Zirconium
  • Dental Implants, Single-Tooth
  • Dental Restoration Wear
  • Aged
  • Titanium
  • Computer-Aided Design
  • Dental Prosthesis Design

Veja também