
Application of operant demand in autism and developmental disabilities: An updated review (2017-2025)
PsiquiatriaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
Operant demand within behavioral economics provides a quantitative framework for evaluating reinforcer efficacy in applied research involving individuals with autism and those with related developmental disabilities. This systematic review extended the work of Gilroy, Kaplan, and Leader (2018) by examining applied operant demand research published between March 2017 and December 2025. Following PRISMA guidelines, 30 articles (31 experiments; 307 participants) were identified and coded for procedural features and methods, including operant arrangements, demand and work output analyses, open and closed economies, and unit price applications. Results indicated increased use of demand and work output analyses and unit price applications. However, open and closed economies remained rarely evaluated and substantial variability was observed in procedural methods used to manipulate price. Findings indicate growing use of operant demand analyses for treatment durability and schedule thinning but continued underuse for generalization variables.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
Application of operant demand in autism and developmental disabilities: An updated review (2017-2025)
Ji Young Kim, Lesley Shawler, Shawn P Gilroy
Descritores MeSH
- Developmental Disabilities
- Economics, Behavioral
- Conditioning, Operant
- Autistic Disorder
- Reinforcement, Psychology
- Humans
- Reinforcement Schedule
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- A systematic review of enhanced resurgence paradigms
- Contingency-based delay to reinforcement following functional communication training for autistic individuals: A multilevel meta-analysis
- Effects of Multiple Schedules of Reinforcement on Appropriate Communication and Challenging Behaviors: A Meta-analysis
- Variable-time schedules protect against effects of fidelity errors during noncontingent reinforcement