ScienceMed®

Accuracy of lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (PICN) ceramic restorations fabricated from subtractive manufacturing: A systematic review of in vitro studies

Medicina
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Glomérulo renal ao microscópio óptico. Mikael Häggström · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons

Revisão sistemáticaNível 1 · Evidência consolidadaJournal of dentistry5 jun 20256 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

To systematically review studies that investigated the accuracy of dental ceramic restorations after subtractive manufacturing.

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines according to PRISMA, electronic searches were performed via OVID MEDLINE(R), Scopus and PubMed for articles between 2003 and 2023. The search strategy was limited to in vitro peer-reviewed publications in the English language. Studies evaluating lithium disilicate (LD) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) material were selected. Exclusion criteria were articles that did not assess the accuracy of subtractively-manufactured ceramic restorations.

A total of 1824 studies were initially identified. After screening titles and abstracts and assessing full-text, 53 in vitro studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The risk of bias was assessed according to a modified Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist.

O que encontraram

Forty-five studies measured marginal and internal gaps. For LD ceramics, the marginal and internal discrepancies ranged from 12.7 μm to 200 μm and 11.41 μm to 391 μm, respectively. Manufactured PICN restorations had a marginal gap between 29.48 μm and 163.1 μm but an internal gap between 50.27 μm and 181.83 μm. Nine studies investigated accuracy. The mean trueness of LD restorations ranged from 26.5 μm to 146 μm, and PICN restorations had mean values between 32.69 μm and 83.04 μm.

Por que isso importa

The accuracy of subtractively-manufactured restorations is influenced by the type of ceramics, tooth preparation, impression digitization, digital design, machining strategy (axis number and instrument tool wear), and post-processing. Heat treatment and adjustment alter the crown fit, and crystallization enlarges the marginal gap but reduces the internal gap of LD restorations.

Multiple factors influence the quality of subtractively-manufactured ceramic restorations. This review highlights the factors that dental practitioners should consider when milling ceramic restorations for the best clinical performance.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

Accuracy of lithium disilicate and polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (PICN) ceramic restorations fabricated from subtractive manufacturing: A systematic review of in vitro studies

Xiaoyun Liu, Andrew B Cameron, Ketil Hegerstrøm Haugli, Adriane Andersen Mougios, Nicholas C K Heng, Joanne J E Choi

Descritores MeSH

  • Dental Prosthesis Design
  • Dental Porcelain
  • Ceramics
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent
  • Dental Materials
  • Polymers
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Humans
  • Dental Marginal Adaptation

Estudos relacionados