
A systematic review on patient perceptions and clinician-reported outcomes when comparing digital and analog workflows for complete dentures
Medicina e TecnologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
To compare digitally fabricated complete dentures to conventionally fabricated dentures using patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures.
This review was structured according to PRISMA guidelines with the protocol registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024526069). An electronic search of the databases with a defined search strategy was completed within PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science from January 2000 to March 2024. Grey literature and article references were searched. Articles were screened by title and abstract, and the remaining articles were screened by full-text review. Articles accepted for inclusion were subjected to a risk-of-bias assessment using Cochrane Collaboration tools (RoB 2 and ROBINS-I).
O que encontraram
From an initial pool of 704 articles, 15 studies met the selection criteria, of which the majority were published within the past 3 years. Within the included studies, there was inconsistency in the assessment methods of patient- and clinician-reported outcomes, making it challenging to draw definitive conclusions. Generally, digital dentures had superior cost-effectiveness and prosthesis fabrication time. Patient satisfaction and denture quality were not consistently improved with digital technology.
Por que isso importa
Studies showed indications of patient satisfaction with digital and conventional dentures. Digital technology may enhance clinical workflows. A trend emerged that milled dentures performed better than printed dentures. Clinicians adopting digital technology into removable prosthodontics may have a learning curve to overcome, and they should consider the patient-clinician relationship in addition to clinical outcomes to achieve patient satisfaction. Additional studies with standardized tools for assessing patient satisfaction are required to enable meaningful comparisons between digital and conventional workflows.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
A systematic review on patient perceptions and clinician-reported outcomes when comparing digital and analog workflows for complete dentures
Amira Fouda, James Tonogai, Peter McDermott, Daniel Wang, Cecilia S Dong
Descritores MeSH
- Denture Design
- Workflow
- Denture, Complete
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Patient Satisfaction
- Humans
- Computer-Aided Design
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Fully digital versus conventional workflow: Are removable complete overdentures equally good? A randomized crossover trial
- CAD/CAM versus traditional complete dentures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient- and clinician-reported outcomes and costs
- Digitally versus conventionally fabricated complete dentures: A systematic review on cost-efficiency analysis and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
- Os protocolos de dentadura completa simplificados preservam os resultados relatados pelo paciente? Revisão sistemática e meta-análise de ensaios controlados aleatórios