
A systematic review of comparisons of AI and radiologists in the diagnosis of HCC in multiphase CT: implications for practice
GastroenterologiaResumo original em inglês
O que aconteceu
This systematic review aims to examine the literature of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among focal liver lesions compared to radiologists on multiphase CT images, focusing on performance metrics that include sensitivity and specificity as a minimum.
We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of Science for studies published from January 2018 to May 2024. Eligible studies evaluated AI algorithms for diagnosing HCC using multiphase CT, with radiologist interpretation as a comparator. The performance of AI models and radiologists was recorded using sensitivity and specificity from each study. TRIPOD + AI was used for quality appraisal and PROBAST was used to assess the risk of bias.
O que encontraram
Seven studies out of the 3532 reviewed were included in the review. All seven studies analysed the performance of AI models and radiologists. Two studies additionally assessed performance with and without supplementary clinical information to assist the AI model in diagnosis. Three studies additionally evaluated the performance of radiologists with assistance of the AI algorithm in diagnosis. The AI algorithms demonstrated a sensitivity ranging from 63.0 to 98.6% and a specificity of 82.0-98.6%. In comparison, junior radiologists (with less than 10 years of experience) exhibited a sensitivity of 41.2-92.0% and a specificity of 72.2-100%, while senior radiologists (with more than 10 years of experience) achieved a sensitivity between 63.9% and 93.7% and a specificity ranging from 71.9 to 99.9%.
Por que isso importa
AI algorithms demonstrate adequate performance in the diagnosis of HCC from focal liver lesions on multiphase CT images. Across geographic settings, AI could help streamline workflows and improve access to timely diagnosis. However, thoughtful implementation strategies are still needed to mitigate bias and overreliance.
Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.
O estudo original
A systematic review of comparisons of AI and radiologists in the diagnosis of HCC in multiphase CT: implications for practice
Jarrod Younger, Emily Morris, Nicholas Arnold, Chanchala Athulathmudali, Janani Pinidiyapathirage, William MacAskill
Descritores MeSH
- Radiologists
- Artificial Intelligence
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
- Liver Neoplasms
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Algorithms
- Liver
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Humans
Veja também
Estudos relacionados
- Advancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma Detection Using Abdominal CT Imaging
- Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) models in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Impact of LI-RADS CT and MRI Ancillary Features on Diagnostic Performance: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
- Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 Major Feature Combinations: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis