ScienceMed®

A randomised study of encorafenib, cetuximab, and FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab in BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer: BREAKWATER Cohort 3

Gastroenterologia
Imagem de arquivo, ilustrativa — não é do estudo. Linfócito T humano ao microscópio eletrônico de varredura (colorizado). NIAID · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Ensaio clínico randomizadoNível 2 · Nova evidênciaAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology31 mai 20262 citações

Salvar

Resumo original em inglês

O que aconteceu

Encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) and mFOLFOX6 or irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) is approved in several countries for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on results from the BREAKWATER trial.

In BREAKWATER Cohort 3, eligible patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive EC+FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab (control). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR), and the key secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by BICR. Other secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.

O que encontraram

A total of 147 patients were randomly allocated in Cohort 3 (EC+FOLFIRI, n = 73; control, n = 74) with similar baseline demographics and disease characteristics across arms. EC+FOLFIRI demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in ORR by BICR {64.4% versus 39.2%, odds ratio = 2.756 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.420-5.348], one-sided P-value = 0.0011}, meeting the primary endpoint (1 March 2025, data cutoff). At the 6 January 2026 data cutoff, the key secondary endpoint was met, with EC+FOLFIRI demonstrating a clinically meaningful and statistically significant PFS [hazard ratio = 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.70), one-sided P-value = 0.0002, 15.2 versus 8.3 months]. Prolonged OS was also observed with EC+FOLFIRI (hazard ratio = 0.56 [95% CI 0.34-0.94], not estimable versus 20.3 months). Serious adverse event rates were 49.3% versus 44.1% for the EC+FOLFIRI versus control arms, respectively. The safety profile was consistent with that known for each agent.

Por que isso importa

EC+FOLFIRI demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in ORR and PFS, with prolonged OS versus control in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. The safety profile was generally manageable, with no new safety signals. These data support EC+FOLFIRI as an additional new standard of care for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, enabling treatment personalisation.

Resumo publicado sob licença CC BY. A tradução para o português ainda não chegou a este estudo.

O estudo original

A randomised study of encorafenib, cetuximab, and FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI with or without bevacizumab in BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer: BREAKWATER Cohort 3

S Kopetz, J Tabernero, S Lonardi, L Shen, H S Wasan, T Yoshino, E Van Cutsem, T W Kim, C Eng, F Ciardiello et al.

Descritores MeSH

  • Camptothecin
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
  • Carbamates
  • Leucovorin
  • Bevacizumab
  • Fluorouracil
  • Humans
  • Male

Veja também

Estudos relacionados